Reacting to the ruling, Mr. Hackman Owusu-Agyeman,
the National Treasurer of the NPP expressed surprise at the turn of events and
said that it ran counter to an earlier agreement that the Party had reached
with Concordia Ventures for an amicable settlement of the dispute. "WE HAD
AGREED WITH THEM (CONCORDIA) IN PRINCIPLE TO PAY-OFF THE DEBT AND HAD EVEN
AGREED UPON A SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT WE DREW UP TO THAT EFFECT," he
explained.
Mr. Owusu-Agyeman said that, following this
agreement, the lawyers of the NPP were to liaise with the counsel for Concordia
Ventures to have the case formally withdrawn from court for the settlement to
be effected. "IT IS SURPRISING THAT, AFTER ALL THESE, THE CASE WAS STILL
IN COURT AND A RULING ON THE MATTER HAS BEEN GIVEN," he said.
The Press Secretary of NPP, Mr. Adu Kwabena- Essem,
issued a statement in support of J.A. Kufuor. The statement described as
"unscrupulous and outrage to journalistic ethics" the publication in
the June 19 - 25 edition of the African Observer that the party's flag-bearer
for the 1996 general elections, Mr. J.A. Kufuor, was involved in the purchase
of vehicles for the last elections.
The statement said the Party was shocked to read the
front page banner headline: "Political deceits" and its purported
story on page two entitled "Doubts about Kufuor". The Press Secretary
said that "ALTHOUGH THE NPP, AS A LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS COMMITTED TO
FREEDOM FOR INDIVIDUALS AND, PARTICULARLY THE MEDIA, IT IS DISTRESSED BY DELIBERATE
ATTEMPTS TO PORTRAY IT OR ITS LEADERSHIP FOR WHAT THEY WERE NOT.
He continued: "IT IS AN OUTRAGE TO JOURNALISTIC
ETHICS AND AN AFFRONT TO ALL THAT IS FAIR AND DECENT" for the African
Observer to label a political leader as "deceitful", and to
"impute" other highly libelous intentions to him on the basis of fact
the paper itself acknowledges are very sketchy.
In his statement the Press Officer of the NPP stated
that, when a reporter of the African Observer called on him to comment on the
issue, the reporter was asked to come back after the Efigya Sekyere East
election to speak to the General Secretary, Mr. Agyenim Boateng; but the
reporter failed to do so.
According to the Press Officer, the fact that the
paper published its "very sketchy" fact without calling back to see
the General Secretary suggested that the paper "was not really interested
in getting the true facts of the matter".
He then stated that any fair-minded person would
conclude from the approach of the African Observer that it was a deliberate
attempt by the paper to tarnish the image of Mr. Kufuor for reasons best known
to the paper. He then added that "the party has had no doubts about the
integrity of Mr. Kufuor who, the party is convinced beyond all doubt, has
always tried to serve it".
Rejecting the claim by the paper that Mr. Kufuor
wanted to win more clout within the party, the statement said Mr. Kufuor was
elected by the party's national delegate's conference and confirmed as the
Great Alliance presidential candidate.
As stated earlier the Deku Committee appointed to
investigate the charges by Mr. Essamuah against J.A. Kufuor decided to request
Essamuah to substantiate the charges he had leveled against Kufuor but would
not deal further with the issue of the transaction regarding the purchase of
motor cycles from Concordia Ltd. Mr. Essamuah objected to this procedure and
sent a letter of protest to the Chairman of the party.
In a statement, the NPP Executive described as
unmeritorious the protest of Mr. Colin Essamuah against the procedure adopted
by the Deku Committee. The statement, issued in Accra and signed by Mr. N. Adu
Kwabena-Essem, was issued to clarify the Deku Committee report and to respond
to the comments and observations by some members of the party against the
report. The statement explained that, while the national executive committee of
the party was deliberating on the Deku Committee Report, Mr. Essamuah protested
against the procedure adopted by the committee to investigate the allegations
contained in his letter. According to the statement, Mr. Essamuah had protested
against the fact that no one else apart from himself was invited to testify at
the Committee. He also protested at the fact that the report had been leaked to
the media.
With regard to the leakage of the report, the
statement of the National Executive Committee noted that the Deku Committee had
suggested that, since it was itself suspected, an entirely new committee should
be set up to investigate who leaked the report. The statement also said that,
in accepting the Committee's report, the National Executive Committee decided
not to accept the Committee's recommendation that Mr. Essamuah be referred to
the Party's disciplinary committee to be sanctioned. The statement added that
"IT WAS AFTER THE NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HAD GIVEN CAREFUL
CONSIDERATION TO THESE AND OTHER SALIENT MATTERS THAT IT DECIDED TO PUT THE
WHOLE EPISODE BEHIND THE PARTY".
Although the NPP had agreed to settle the dispute
concerning the transaction with Concordia Ventures without further recourse to
the court, subsequent developments showed that the issue itself did not go away
as quietly as had been hoped.
With a view to helping the NPP to defray the costs
of the Concordia transaction and the court action relating to it, the National
Executive Committee decided to request every presidential aspirant to
contribute $2,000 to funds to be mobilized by the Party to settle the debt
incurred in respect of the Concordia Ventures transaction.
However, Mr. Koi-Larbi, one of the Party's presidential
aspirants, expressed opposition to the special levy on presidential aspirants
to help settle the $90,000 debt to Concordia Ventures Ltd.
In a letter to the General Secretary of the Party
which was later issued to the press, he said: "I SHALL BE READY TO PAY THE
SAID AMOUNT IF WRITTEN ASSURANCES WOULD BE GIVEN TO THE EFFECT THAT THOSE
RESPONSIBLE SHALL BE PUBLICLY REPRIMANDED AND CORRECTIVE MEASURES TAKEN TO
PREVENT A RECURRENCE".
He added that, to avoid a repetition of such a
serious matter, it was essential for the party to identify and deal with those
who led it into incurring such a debt. He described the incident as unfortunate
and lamented the fact that, instead of looking for money to revitalize
constituency organizations, "WE ARE LOOKING FOR MONEY TO PAY DUBIOUS DEBTS
FOR WHICH NOBODY HAS BEEN REPRIMANDED OR DISCIPLINED".
He also queried why the National Executive Committee
of the party had decided to impose "the tax" to settle the debt only
on the presidential aspirants for the year 2000 elections. He further demanded
an assurance that the items were duly received by the accredited agents of the
party in the constituencies.
Eventually, the Party considered it necessary to put
the controversy behind it, and to concentrate its efforts rather on the
preparations for the next electoral battle which was expected in 2000 when
elections would be held for both President and members of Parliament.