If Jesus had come today instead of 2,000 years ago,
Christian pastors and bishops would also have killed him.
A man travelling from Jerusalem to Jericho was
attacked by armed-robbers, stripped of his belongings and left lying on the
road half-dead. God’s providence ensured
that first a priest, and then a Levite, passed by. But instead of helping the dying man; both of
them quickly moved to the other side and went away. Finally, a Samaritan came along. Unlike the priest and the Levite, he had
compassion on the injured man, bound up his wounds, took him to the hospital
and paid for his medical expenses.
The Good Samaritan
Jesus’ story of the Good Samaritan is very
deliberate. It is incredible how, as
Christians, we still fail to understand its full implications. The first mistake we make is in the identity
of the Good Samaritan. When we situate
the story in the contemporary setting (as we should with all scripture), we
assume that the Good Samaritan is a Christian.
However, Jesus deliberately excludes that possibility by providing two
characters clearly representative of the Christians of today. The priest is easily identifiable as today’s
pastor, while the Levite is easily today’s Christian layman.
Who then is the Good Samaritan? Let me repeat this for emphasis: the Good
Samaritan cannot be a Christian. The
Christian is already adequately represented.
The Good Samaritan is Jesus himself.
Jesus’ story eloquently sets forth the goodness and kindness of Christ
our Saviour towards sinful, miserable and defenceless humanity. The thief came to steal, kill and destroy,
but Christ came to give life and to give it abundantly. (John 10:10).
But there is the rub. If Jesus is the Good Samaritan then Jesus is
not a Jew; for Samaritans were not accepted as Jews. If Jesus is the Good Samaritan, then Jesus is
a Samaritan. If Jesus is not a Jew but a
Samaritan, then Jesus cannot be a Christian, for it is the Jew who represents
the Christian of today.
Jesus killers
By the time some Jews observed Jesus, they assumed
he was not a Jew. In the first place, he
refused to be a disciple of Moses but claimed instead to have come to fulfil
the law. He did not obey the letter of
Jewish laws but claimed to comply with its spirit. He insisted pharisaic religious tradition was
old wine which could not be put into the new bottles he provided for the new
wine of the New Testament. (Matthew 9:17).
He prefaced a lot of his sermons with the statement: “You have heard
that it was said to those of old… but I say.” (Matthew 5:27-28).
Therefore, some Jews insisted Jesus was not Jewish. As a matter of fact, their position was that
he was a closet Samaritan: “Then the Jews answered and said to him, “Do we not
say rightly that you are a Samaritan and have a demon?” Jesus answered, “I do not have a demon; but I
honour my Father, and you dishonour me.” (John 8:48-49). Note that Jesus did not contest the charge
that he was a Samaritan. But he took
great exception to the allegation that he had a demon.
But if Jesus identified with the Samaritans and not
with the Jews, then it becomes clear he would not identify with most of the
Christians of today. In fact, let me be
so bold as to say that if Jesus were in the flesh today he would not be a
Christian. If Jesus had come today
instead of 2,000 years ago, Christian pastors and bishops would also have
killed him. Like he did our forefathers,
Jesus would also have exposed our ungodliness to public ridicule.
Religious irrelevancies
So if Jesus would not have been a Christian, what
would he have been? He would have simply
been Jesus without any specific religious affiliation. Today, Jesus has been replaced by theology,
but the real Jesus was not religious.
Jesus established no religious institution when he was on earth.
Indeed, if Jesus were to show up physically on earth
today, most Christians would not recognise him even as the Jews did not. If he came as a woman, we would not recognise
him. If he smoked cigarettes, we would
not recognise him. If he drank whisky,
we would not recognise him. If he wore
earrings and a nose ring, we would not recognise him. If he spoke Pidgin English, we would not
recognise him. Since he did not wear
trousers, we would be contemptuous of him.
We would disqualify him by religious irrelevancies instead of
identifying him by his fruits.
When Jesus asked the lawyer to identify the
neighbour of the man who fell among thieves, the man wisely did not say it was
the Samaritan. If he had said that, he
would have been wrong. Instead, he
correctly defined him by his fruit. He
said: “He who showed mercy on him.” He
who showed mercy on him could be anybody, Christian or non-Christian, as long
as he believed in Jesus and produced the fruits of his righteousness.
Merciless Christians
What then does the story of the Good Samaritan mean
if, indeed, the priest and the Levite represent today’s Christians? It means that, prophetically, it is the
Christians of today who have no mercy.
We despise unbelievers, certain they are going to hell. We speak disparagingly of them. We condemn sinners on grounds they are
ungodly. We stone them because they are
caught in adultery. We fail to
appreciate that they are hapless travellers on the road of life who have been
attacked by spiritual armed-robbers and left for dead. We conveniently forget that we used to be in
the same position until we were rescued by the grace of God.
Therefore, “God is not a Christian,” declared
Reverend Desmond Tutu. “We are supposed
to proclaim the God of love, but we have been guilty as Christians of sowing
hatred and suspicion; we commend the one whom we call the Prince of Peace, and
yet as Christians we have fought more wars than we care to remember. We have claimed to be a fellowship of
compassion and caring and sharing, but as Christians we often sanctify
sociopolitical systems that belie this, where the rich grow ever richer and the
poor grow ever poorer.”
One thing is certain. Both the offending priest and the Levite must
have had “compelling” reasons for not attending to the man dying on the
roadside. They probably could not stop
because they were in a hurry to attend a bible study. The priest decided that the best thing to do
was to pray for the man when he got to church.
The Levite was hurrying to get to a meeting of the Pentecostal
Fellowship of Nigeria and could not afford to be late.
Jesus’ parable “kills” the self-righteous believer
who thinks he is justified by calling himself a Christian and by going
regularly to church. He alerts us to the
danger of assuming we are heaven-bound because of our observance of certain
religious rites. True Christianity is
not legalistic. The love of our
neighbour is the emblem of our being Christ’s disciples.
“Dear friends, let us practice loving each other,
for love comes from God and those who are loving and kind show that they are
the children of God.” (1 John 4:7).
Source: Femi
Femi
No comments:
Post a Comment